
Responding to this, the court docket mentioned that there was no bias in RK Laxman’s work however there’s bias in The Ba***ds of Bollywood, since Aryan and Wankhede have a historical past. Senior Advocate Sai Deepak who’s showing for Wankhede argued that satire is normally based mostly on actual incidents, not fiction and questioned, “Who’re you making a satire on?” He additionally mentioned that the scene was a mockery of his consumer and eradicating it won’t disrupt the narrative of the present however maintaining it would have an effect on Wankhede.

The court docket then enquired in regards to the pending CBI, ED, and CAT instances in opposition to Wankhede to which he responded, “Do I deserve this trial in public opinion?” Wankhede’s lawyer additional argued that his household has been ridiculed via the present. He cited a assessment by Kamal R Khan that accused The Ba***ds of Bollywood of ridiculing Wankhede. “The present has satisfied people who I’ve no integrity. Chor, and what else? Crimson Chillies and Netflix are in cahoots with one another. They aren’t saying we’re simply an middleman, so a sure diploma of legal responsibility is on Netflix as properly,” added the lawyer.